AI Tools

This聽overview of聽AI tools is provided for information and awareness only.聽As the AI tool landscape changes rapidly, this is not an exhaustive listing.聽These AI tools are not necessarily approved or endorsed by聽91制牌厂视频. Only vetted and approved AI tools may be used for institutional work聽(with institutional data),聽in accordance with聽policy IT18 Artificial Intelligence (AI)聽Use,聽institutional AI use guidance,聽data protection requirements, and role-based expectations.聽

    • Typical Use:聽Drafting, summarization, explanation, brainstorming, code聽assistance聽
    • Fit with Academic Medicine:聽High interest,聽high risk. Widely used by faculty, learners, clinicians, and staff. Requires strong governance and clear boundaries in an聽academic medicine聽environment.聽
    • Tool Examples:聽ChatGPT (public/enterprise), Claude (public/enterprise), Google Gemini, Microsoft Copilot (LLM layer), Meta Llama (open-source variants)聽
    • Data Types That May Be Used:聽Public information; de-identified or hypothetical scenarios; non-sensitive institutional content explicitly approved for use.聽
    • 厂别肠耻谤颈迟测听骋耻颈诲补苍肠别:聽Public versions聽remain聽at聽high risk. Enterprise or education tenants offer improved controls but still require approved use, strict data protections, human review and accountability, and disclosure when AI contributes meaningfully. Output is not authoritative and must be聽validated.聽
    • Typical Use:聽Literature discovery, citation context, research synthesis聽
    • Fit with Academic Medicine:聽Strong fit for research and scholarship when used as support tools, not authoritative sources. Aligns well with library-supported workflows.聽
    • Tool Examples:聽Elicit, Scite, Semantic Scholar, Consensus,聽ResearchRabbit聽
    • Data Types That May Be Used:聽Publicly available literature; citation metadata; high-level research questions that do not include confidential review materials or unpublished data.聽
    • Security Guidance:聽Lower inherent data risk, but confidential review materials remain protected.聽Citations and summaries must be independently verified. Disclosure聽is increasingly聽expected by publishers and funders.聽
    • Typical Use:聽Writing, editing, summarization, organization, task support聽
    • Fit with Academic Medicine:聽Good fit when embedded in institutionally governed platforms and used for non-sensitive academic or administrative work.聽
    • Tool Examples:聽Microsoft Copilot (M365), Google Workspace AI, Grammarly, Notion AI聽
    • Data Types That May Be Used:聽Non-sensitive drafts; general communications; materials without PII, PHI, FERPA, or confidential institutional content.聽
    • Security Guidance:聽Risk depends on platform governance and configuration. Even when institutionally managed, sensitive data must still be protected and outputs reviewed before use in decisions or publications.聽
    • Typical Use:聽Transcription, meeting summaries, action items聽
    • Fit with Academic Medicine:聽Limited fit. Elevated privacy and compliance risk in healthcare and education environments;聽appropriate only聽in narrowly approved scenarios.聽
    • Tool Examples:聽Otter.ai, Fireflies.ai, Fathom, Zoom AI Companion, Microsoft Teams transcription聽
    • Data Types That May Be Used:聽Non-sensitive meetings with informed participants; operational discussions explicitly approved for recording.聽
    • Security Guidance:聽Highest privacy and compliance risk. Likely to capture PHI or sensitive information. Consent, notification, retention controls, and explicit approval are聽required.聽
    • Typical Use:聽Data analysis, dashboards, natural-language querying of datasets聽
    • Fit with Academic Medicine:聽Strong fit when aligned with institutional analytics governance, data stewardship, and reporting standards.聽
    • Tool Examples:聽Power BI Copilot, Tableau Pulse/AI, Looker, ThoughtSpot聽
    • Data Types That May Be Used:聽Approved institutional datasets; de-identified or aggregated data; analytics environments governed by IT and Data Analytics.聽
    • Security Guidance:聽Risk is driven by the underlying data, not the AI interface. AI-generated insights must be聽validated聽and contextualized and do not replace data governance or human interpretation.聽
    • Typical Use:聽Documentation support, decision support, triage, ambient scribing聽
    • Fit with Academic Medicine:聽Highly constrained fit. Requires close coordination across Clinical Affairs,聽compliance,聽legal, IT, and聽risk聽management.聽聽
    • Tool Examples:聽Nuance DAX, Abridge, Suki,聽Nabla, Freed, Heidi Health聽
    • Data Types That May Be Used:聽Limited PHI as聽permitted聽under formal agreements,聽business associate agreements, and clinical policy; documented workflows only.聽
    • Security Guidance:聽High regulatory and patient safety聽risk. Requires formal approval, contractual safeguards, clinician oversight, patient communication, and ongoing monitoring. AI does not replace clinical judgment.聽
    • Typical Use:聽Embedded clinical decision support, documentation, predictive analytics聽
    • Fit with Academic Medicine:聽Best-fit clinical AI category when vendor-integrated and governed within the EHR environment.聽
    • Tool Examples:聽Epic-integrated AI features (ambient documentation, CDS modules, predictive risk tools)聽
    • Data Types That May Be Used:聽PHI as聽permitted聽within the EHR under existing governance, audit, and security controls.聽
    • Security Guidance:聽Still聽high risk, but mitigated by EHR governance, vendor accountability, and auditability. Requires clinical validation, monitoring, and adherence to clinical policies.
  • Users may聽encounter聽AI-enabled features through Epic聽or Epic-connected modules used by partner organizations. These capabilities may appear embedded or available by default but should not be assumed to be approved for use at聽91制牌厂视频.聽聽Availability within Epic does not equal approval. Use requires alignment with聽the聽91制牌厂视频聽Office of聽Clinical Affairs,聽Information Technology, compliance,聽and legal聽requirements.聽Examples may include聽ambient or assisted documentation, predictive聽alerts聽or risk stratification, in basket聽or workflow prioritization, population health or operational analytics.聽If you聽encounter聽a new AI-enabled Epic feature and are unsure聽pause before聽proceeding. Do聽not enable or rely on the feature for patient care.聽Consult聽appropriate leadership聽or IT for evaluation.聽